FROM PAGE B1

The digital euro would give more choice and let consumers “preserve their freedom to choose how to pay as daily life becomes more digital”, he added.

WHY DOES THE EU WANT A DIGITAL EURO?

Payment systems are “not neutral” but “instruments of power”, centrist EU lawmaker Gilles Boyer said in a statement.

“We, Europeans, have had many wake-up calls about our dependence on the US. We’re fully awake now, but we’re not always acting,” he said, adding Tuesday’s vote would make “a sovereign, pan-European payment solution a reality”.

EU officials often point to Washington’s 2025 sanctions against International Criminal Court judges to illustrate the grip of US firms. French judge Nicolas Guillou has described how he lost access to his Visa card.

The digital euro is “a chance to end a dependence we have lived with for too long”.

According to the ECB, nearly two-thirds of card payments in the euro area are handled by non-European companies -- mostly Visa and Mastercard.

And 13 out of 21 eurozone countries have no national card scheme for day-to-day payments in shops or online stores.

WHO DOESN’T WANT IT?

Banks. The main reason for their reticence is the cost.

Adapting the banking system to the digital euro will cost 18 billion euros ($20 billion), a report in April by the European Banking Federation said.

But the ECB insists it will cost the banking sector between four and 5.8 billion euros in investment costs.

Banks also fear the effects on their financial stability because if customers convert their money into digital euros, bank deposits would plummet.

The ECB says there is no risk.

“Thanks to its design that prevents large deposit outflows, the digital euro wouldn’t cause these risks -- even in extreme and unlikely crisis situations,” Giovannini said.

European banks also fear reduced demand for their online services and worry the digital euro is a rival to the pan-European payment system Wero.