#Title

3 binding conditions for IMF loan
FROM PAGE 1
Bangladesh’s loan application in its meeting in the third week of January next year, the first instalment of $447.8 million would be released the following month without the need for any prior action.
The QPCs will kick in from the second instalment onwards.
When authorising the first instalment, the IMF staff mission will set the targets for the QPCs for the second instalment of $659.18 million, scheduled for six months later.
If the government fails to meet the QPC targets, the IMF would not approve the second instalment. And if the government meets the targets, the funds would be released and the IMF staff mission would then proceed to set the targets for the next instalment, which would also be $659.18 million.
The process would repeat for the successive four instalments of $659.18 million each scheduled every six months.
Closer to home, Pakistan’s $6 billion loan programme was stalled midway after the country failed to meet two of its six QPCs.
Zahid Hussain, a former lead economist of the World Bank’s Dhaka office, is unsure whether the three QPCs set would be practicable and effective.
“In case of reserves, it is possible to set an achievable QPC, and based on that, reforms in exchange rate management can be hoped.”
For revenue, unless the floor is realistic and based on historical performance, it could derail the programme for Bangladesh.
“For budget deficit, since it is a ratio, it will depend on a random factor. If the GDP deficit does not increase, then the question arises of where you would do the correction: numerator or denominator. This is not a good QPC and will create confusion.”
Identifying the corrective actions for failure to meet the budget deficit QPC would be tricky then, Hussain added.
Other than the three QPCs, the IMF loan programme, which would be the 13th for Bangladesh, would come with a host of indicative targets and 15-16 structural benchmarks. Both the structural benchmarks and indicative targets would have a timeline.
Indicative targets are similar to QPCs in that those are quantitative indicators to assess progress in meeting a programme’s objectives. Sometimes ITs are set instead of QPCs because of uncertainty about economic trends. As uncertainty is reduced, these targets may become QPCs, with appropriate modifications.
Structural benchmarks are reform measures that often are non-quantifiable but are critical for achieving programme goals and are intended as markers to assess programme implementation.
Missed structural benchmarks and indicative targets would not lead to a pause in instalment disbursements. But the country would need to send in a detailed report to the IMF board on why the conditions were not met.
The IMF board would assess it in the context of overall programme performance and then give a fresh timeline to meet those conditions.
The structural benchmarks for Bangladesh would comprise measures to improve governance in the financial sector; amendments to the Bank Company Act; leaving out government staff’s pension and interest on savings certificates from social safety net programmes; implementing the VAT law; automated fuel pricing; setting up an asset management company to dispose of soured loans.
Indicative targets may include bringing down the banking sector’s default loans to within 10 percent and raising the capital adequacy ratio to the BASEL 3 requirement of 12.5 percent and a minimum level for social spending.
In the coming weeks, the IMF staff mission would be preparing a country report including the terms agreed upon by the government.
The report would be sent to the government by the middle of December. Finance Minister AHM Mustafa Kamal and Bangladesh Bank Governor Abdur Rouf Talukder would then sign on the dotted line and send the official proposal to the IMF management, which would be forwarded to the board.
Then in the second week of January, a deputy managing director of the IMF would visit Bangladesh on a fact-finding mission.
The deputy managing director would be placing the proposal to the IMF board and answering all queries the board members might have on the loan proposal when authorising the programme.

Of stars
FROM PAGE 1
team. Perhaps it is down to all the democracy in France that encourages everyone to politick for their own space.
A bit of autocratic leadership might be in order, however, and based on Tuesday night’s performance, it would seem that Kylian Mbappe might be the one to provide it.
France deserve ample praise for keeping things fun between the seismic events of Tuesday’s first match, and the drama of yesterday’s second offering. From here on, I hope that the African nations find their scoring boots, and some Europeans play with more decisiveness. Otherwise, too many games would end up as dull affairs.
What was not boring, however, was the gut punch to conventional expectation that we witnessed yesterday as Japan added a whole lot of wasabi to Qatar’s football dish.
The Samurai Blue were always going to pose a bigger challenge for the favourites than other underdogs in the tournament, given that many of their players ply their trade in the Bundesliga and other European leagues, but the way Japan went to toe to toe with mighty Germany for most of the game was a soothing sight for cynical eyes.
It is worth mentioning that this edition’s German team appear to be not made of the same ruthless material as some of their predecessors. They break the stereotype of cold efficiency, with a combination of happy flair and sad vulnerability.
Times they are a-changin’ in football, and based on what we witnessed in the last two days, that could very well be a beautiful thing.