& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

US-China trade war escalates

Trump raises tariffs on $200b of Chinese goods amid talks to rescue deal; Beijing vows to strike back

Reuters, Washington
The United States escalated a tariff war with China yesterday by hiking levies on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods amid last-ditch talks to rescue a trade deal, as US President Donald Trump signalled that talks could drag on beyond this week.
In a series of early morning tweets, Trump defended his decision to raise tariffs, saying there was no need to rush into a deal and adding that the American economy would be boosted more by the levies than by an eventual deal.
But even as Beijing threatened retaliation, negotiators agreed to stay at the table in Washington for a second day, keeping alive hopes of an agreement that would remove a major threat to the global economy.
Trump, who has adopted protectionist policies as part of his "America First" agenda, issued orders for the tariff increase, saying China "broke the deal" by reneging on earlier commitments made during months of negotiations.
China's Commerce Ministry said it would take countermeasures, without elaborating.
Chinese Vice Premier Liu He, US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin talked for 90 minutes on Thursday and were expected to resume efforts to rescue a deal that could end a 10-month trade war between the world's two largest economies.
The Commerce Ministry said negotiations were continuing, and that it "hopes the United States can meet China halfway, make joint efforts, and resolve the issue through cooperation and consultation."
With negotiations in progress, US Customs and Border Protection imposed a 25% duty on more than 5,700 categories of products leaving China after 12:01 am EDT (0401 GMT) yesterday.
Seaborne cargoes shipped from China before midnight were not subject to the new tax as long as they arrived in the United States prior to June 1. Those cargoes will be charged the original 10% rate.
"This delay might create an unofficial window during which the US and China can continue to negotiate," investment bank Goldman Sachs wrote in a note, adding that it was a "somewhat positive sign" that talks were continuing.
Trump gave US importers less than five days notice about his decision to increase the rate on the $200 billion
category of goods, which now matches the rate on a prior $50 billion category of Chinese machinery and technology goods.
He has also threatened to impose new tariffs soon.
'NO GREATER THREAT TO GROWTH'
Global stocks gained slightly after Washington moved forward with the tariff hike, reflecting some hope that a trade deal could still be brokered. But a major world index looked set for its worst week since December.
"There is no greater threat to world growth," French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire said yesterday.
The added levy could reduce US gross domestic product (GDP) by 0.3% and China's by 0.8% in 2020, consultancy Oxford Economics said.
"A quarter of our members have exports to the US that were already affected by these ridiculous tariffs,” said Mats Harborn, president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China.
"Pushing rates to 25% will prove extremely damaging to those companies, and the collateral damage will ripple around the globe. European companies are watching aghast as the U.S. and China play Russian roulette with the world economy." RETALIATE HOW?
In April 2018, when Trump's tariffs were still largely just threats, China's Commerce Ministry responded to his escalatory tweets by declaring that the two sides could not conduct negotiations "under these conditions." But more than a year later, Liu was in Washington trying to save the deal even as Trump warned that the United States would start "paperwork" on another $325 billion in Chinese imports, after raising tariffs on $250 billion of Chinese goods.
“I think the Chinese in the end will want to keep negotiations going. The question is: 'where do they go for retaliation?"' said James Green, a senior adviser at McLarty Associates who until August was the top USTR official at the embassy in Beijing.
Green expected China to increase non-tariff barriers on US companies, such as delaying regulatory approvals, as it could not hit the same amount of imported US goods with higher tariffs.
The biggest Chinese sector affected by the latest tariff increase is a $20 billion-plus category of internet modems, routers and other data transmission devices, followed by about $12 billion worth of printed circuit boards used in a vast array of US-made products.
Furniture, lighting products, auto parts, vacuum cleaners and building
materials are also high on the list of products subject to higher duties.
Just hours after the US move, which will add pressure on an already slowing Chinese economy, China's central bank said it was fully able to cope with any external uncertainty. WHO PAYS?
Fu Xubo, a 32-year-old sports equipment wholesaler in the eastern city of Yiwu, used to have several small US clients. Since the trade war began, all of their orders have dried up.
"Regarding Mr Trump's tariff policy, honestly, we just don't understand it," Fu said. "Since we have already joined the World Trade Organization, logically shouldn't tariffs have continued to decrease?"
Gary Shapiro, chief executive of the Consumer Technology Association, said the tariffs would be paid by American consumers and businesses, not China, as Trump has claimed.
"Our industry supports more than 18 million US jobs - but raising tariffs will be disastrous," Shapiro said in a statement.
It may take three or four months for American shoppers to feel the pinch, but retailers will have little choice but to raise prices to cover the rising cost of imports before too long, economists and industry consultants say.