& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

Debate rages over Stokes

AFP, London
England star Ben Stokes may have been cleared of affray but former cricket luminaries, while agreeing his behaviour was
well below that expected of a man seen by many as a role model, are divided as to whether he should face further punishment.
The 27-year-old New Zealand-born all-rounder faces an internal disciplinary enquiry by the Cricket Discipline Commission (CDC) following his acquittal by unanimous decision of a jury on Tuesday.
Former Derbyshire batsman and qualified solicitor Tim O'Gorman is heading the investigation.
Stokes's team-mate Alex Hales - who was with him during the late night brawl outside a club in Bristol, southwest England, last September but was not charged - will also face the enquiry.
However, former England captains Mike Atherton and Nasser Hussain whilst both abhorring his behaviour are at odds with each other as to whether he should be punished further.
"With a not-guilty verdict, the way forward seems, to me, to be clear enough and should not involve further punishment," Atherton writes in The Times. Atherton conceded Stokes's heavy drinking that night and what ensued afterwards "is not exactly acceptable behaviour for an England player during international duty".
"There are clauses in an England cricketer's contract - such as bringing
the game into disrepute - that could yet result in punishment," the 50-year-old commented. "Although Stokes was never formally suspended from the England team, his non-selection for the Ashes came about clearly as a result of the events in Bristol. He missed the most high-profile series in which an England cricketer can play, essentially a six-month ban."
Hussain argued differently, saying the images caught on CCTV cannot just be ignored and the governing body the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) have to act.
With a not-guilty verdict, the way
Forward seems, to me, to be clear enough and should not involve Further punishment.
MICHAEL ATHERTON
"Some people would argue that Ben Stokes has had it tough, and has served his time in missing the Ashes, but I see it differently," he told The Daily Mail. "The ECB should not now take the easy option. It is far too serious an issue, and the footage far too serious, for people to think about moving on and
brushing things under the carpet."
Former England spinner Vic Marks says in The Guardian there is no doubt Stokes "brought the game into disrepute" on a "feral night out" which does nothing to promote the image of the game the ECB wants to display to families.
Marks draws comparison between Stokes and a superstar all-rounder of another era and one he played with in the great Somerset side of the 1970's and 80's, Ian Botham.
"The very best cricketers often ooze invincibility; they are never out and never wrong," wrote Marks. "They feel invulnerable, capable of dominating any situation. I have witnessed this at close quarters when playing alongside Ian Botham."
"In Botham's era the backroom staff were not so sophisticated," observed Marks. "He once had an agent, Tim Hudson, whose response to an allegation about Ian smoking cannabis was famously, "Doesn't everyone?"