& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

THE BUSINESS OF WAR

Nadia Kabir Barb
THERE is a conspiracy theorist lurking inside most of us. Some have the unshakeable belief that Elvis Presley faked his own death or that a UFO landed in Roswell, New Mexico and the US government covered up the story. Others suspect that AIDS is a manmade disease, Princess Diana's death was not an accident and that we are constantly being watched by Big Brother. It can be hard to resist the temptation to speculate, analyse and expound on different theories, ranging from the inane to the truly frightening. At the end of the day, there is some comfort in the knowledge that it is just conjecture. But when these conspiracy theories turn out to be based on the truth, it is not always as simple and as satisfying as 'I told you so'. On the contrary, it can be deeply distressing, especially if the reality is far worse than the speculation.
Shadow World, a hard-hitting and thought-provoking documentary directed by lohan Grimonprez and written by Andrew Feinstein based on his book The Shadow World: Inside the Global Arms Trade, gives us an insight into the extent of corruption that encompasses the global arms trade. As many have suspected, not only is global conflict lining the pockets of politicians, senior military personnel, weapons manufacturers and businesses, governments around the world are also complicit in profiting from death, destruction and the human suffering of millions. And the scale of it is breathtaking. From billion dollar handshakes that take place between governments to multimillion-dollar backroom deals and bribes, the film confronts us with the harsh reality of the global arms trade and the actual cost of war.
Where there is conflict, there is money to be made. With so many countries involved in regional disputes or an arms race either manufacturing or amassing weapons and investing in military technology, there is an opportunity for the arms manufacturers, often from wealthier more developed economies, to sell, often to corrupt elites in less developed countries. 'World peace' is a utopian ideal more honoured in word than in deed.
According to The Institute for Economics and Peace a think tank that has produced the Global Peace Index (an attempt to measure the relative position of nations' and regions' peacefulness) Iceland is the world's most peaceful country, followed by Denmark, Austria, New Zealand, Portugal, Czech Republic Switzerland, Canada, Japan and Slovenia. Their findings also state that Botswana, Chile, Costa Rica, Japan, Mauritius, Panama, Qatar, Switzerland, Uruguay and Vietnam are the only countries free from conflict - only 10 out of the 162 ranked countries. In other words, we are a world at war and we live in a cynical world where war, not peace is ultimately a business.
The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri), a leading independent research body reported that the total sales of arms, including military services of the top 100 arms companies in the world, was over USD 400 billion in 2010. Britain is currently the second biggest arms dealer in the world with the US taking the number one spot. This is hardly surprising when both the US and the UK have the biggest weapons manufacturing companies such as Lockheed Martin (US), BAE Systems (UK) and Boeing (US) to name a few.
It was an eye opener having attended the screening of the documentary and having the opportunity to talk with Andrew Feinstein. According to him, ’The trade in weapons accounts for around 40 percent of all corruption in all world trade. Those who make the decisions to go to war are often the very same people who benefit materially and politically". The reality is that peace is not profitable. He goes on to say, "Arms deals are done by a combination of governments, politicians, senior military officials, intelligence operatives, the weapons makers and arms dealers, all of
whom ultimately benefit. This ensures that these powerful forces collude to ensure the outcome is best for them rather than in the national interest." The decision to go to war is not borne out of any noble sentiment and is effectively financially motivated. It can affect economic and foreign policy. A prime example of this is Dick Cheney, the former United States vice president. Cheney was one of the primary proponents of the invasion of Iraq and his former company Halliburton, in which he still had a significant stake, benefited from the invasion, to the sum of USD 39 billion. Shadow World suggests that as a consequence, Cheney's personal wealth increased exponentially. Unsurprisingly, the invasion was camouflaged in a cloak of nobility. The narrative to the voting population was based on untrue and unproven allegations of existing weapons of mass destruction. The consequences are still being felt not just by the population of Iraq but by the rest of the world.
As tax payers, we are also complicit in the actions that our governments take and the ensuing consequences. We are effectively funding wars in countries based on the most tenuous of reasons with the money going towards a defence budget that we have no control over. To put things in perspective, since 2010, Britain has also sold arms to 22 of the 30 countries on the UK government's own human rights watch list. The UK has, at various times, sold weapons to Saddam's Iraq, the Ayatollah's Iran and the Taliban in Afghanistan, even in conflict with each other.
Since civil war broke out in March 2015 between the Western and Saudi-backed government and Houthi rebels in Yemen, Saudi Arabia has launched airstrikes with devastating consequences, killing over 10,000 people. The most recent bombing was of a funeral, killing 140 civilians and injuring almost 600 people. Despite these attacks being widely condemned as having violated international humanitarian law, the US has approved a USD 1.15 billion arms sale and the UK government has pledged over £3 billion worth of weaponry since the beginning of the conflict.
The symbiotic relationship between the UK and Saudi Arabia has a long history. Saudi Arabia has been a major buyer of UK weapons since
the 1960s. Through candid interviews with investigative journalists, military personnel, activists and even arms dealers. Shadow World shows us how embedded the culture of mutual back scratching and profiteering truly is. The biggest and most controversial deal was the Al Yamamah deal that took place between the UK government and Saudi Arabia in 1985. At the time, the financial benefits from the deal were thought to be so lucrative that the British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher stepped in to lead the negotiations in person. Her direct intervention with Prince Bandar and King Fahd helped to clinch the deal for the BAE, cutting France out (which was in mid negotiations with Saudi Arabia at the same time). Al Yamamah turned out to be the world's biggest arms deal, bringing in over £43 billion in revenue for the BAE over the course of the next twenty years. What was shocking were the sums of money paid in commissions and bribes to Saudi royals through agents, brokers and middlemen, estimated by the police as being more than £6 billion. Despite this becoming public knowledge, no one has been prosecuted nor made accountable.
Feinstein states, "The trade in weapons is a parallel world of money, corruption, deceit and death. It operates according to its own rules, largely unscrutinised, bringing enormous benefits to the chosen few, and suffering and immiseration to millions. The trade corrodes our democracies, weakens already fragile states and often undermines the very national security it purports to strengthen." The author is a contributor and short story writer, based in UK.