& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

N Korea not guilty of Sony hack: experts

Mail Online
The FBI just last week confirmed what many Americans already assumed to be a forgone conclusion when they revealed there was conclusive evidence that North Korea’s government was behind the hacking of Sony, an attack the government bureau said was carried out as a way 'to inflict significant harm on a US business and suppress the right of American citizens to express themselves.’
Then, in a press conference on Friday, President Obama went so far as to warn the country that America would retaliate in response their actions.
Almost immediately the North Korean leader issued a statement denying involvement and demanding an apology from the United States for their 'evil doings.' And while that apology is probably never coming it seems that Kim Jong-un may be right, at least according to numerous cybersecurity experts and hackers who have come forward to point out the flaws in the FBI's investigation.
The problems with the FBI's investigation are best explained by Marc Rogers in an article he wrote for The Daily Beast.
Working as both the director of security operations for DEF CON, the world's largest hacker conference, and the principal security researcher for global CDN and DNS provider Cloudflare, Rogers may be one of the foremost experts when it comes to hacking.
The first FBI claim that Rogers tears down also happens to be one the strongest that the FBI has, saying in their statement; The malware used in this attack revealed links to other malware that the FBI knows North Korean actors previously developed.'
There are two problems with this according to Rogers. First,while a similar malware may have been used in a previous cyber attack that North Korea has been linked to, that does not serve as definitive proof that this attack was carried out by North Korea. What's more, the coding for one of the two malwares, Shamoon, was leaked according to Harris, and would not be difficult for any hackerto find.
He then takes aim at the FBI conclusion that since the IP addresses used in the attack are addresses used by North Korea in previous attacks, they must be responsible. But he also found this naive as any expert hacker can use the proxies. And this has been the case in many past incidents.
Kurt Stammberger, a senior vice president with cybersecurity firm Norse, echoed many of Harris' statements in a separate interview, and said that given the severity of the hack it had to have been an inside job.
But information so far gathered point to a different direction, experts argue.
First of all, there is the fact that the attackers only brought up the antiNorth Korean bias of "The Interview" after the media did—the film was never mentioned by the hackers right at the start of their campaign.
The hackers dumped the data. Would a state with a keen understanding of the power of propaganda be so willing to just throw away such a trove of information?
You don't need to be a conspiracy theorist to see that blaming North Korea is quite convenient for the FBI and the current US administration. It's the perfect excuse to push through whatever new, strong, cyber-laws they feel are appropriate, safe in the knowledge that an outraged public is fairly likely to support them.