& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

Three reviews by Syed Badrul Ahsan

Savagery unparalleled in human history
Ekattorer Chithl Edit. Salahuddin Ahmed, others
Prothoma Prokashon
LETTERS from the war zone have always been heartbreaking. Despite all the old yarn about wars being adventures in courage and vanquishing the enemy being a proud tale of heroism, there is the sheer loneliness that comes through in the missives of those who write back home. So it was in 1971, as this rich collection of poignant letters makes obvious. But what does shine through all along is that sure grasp of hope that these letter writers demonstrate in their communication with their families and friends. That their belief in freedom is unalloyed, that Bangladesh will soon be a free nation, is the common principle which binds all of them together.
Gathering and collating letters from a distant wartime era is naturally an arduous job. And especially at a time when much of the historical record vis-^-vis Bangladesh's struggle for liberation has been getting lost or becoming hazy, owing to the depredations of politically dishonest elements, it is doubly difficult to undertake a project of seeking and actually finding letters which the nation's freedom fighters wrote to their loved ones in 1971. The publishers of this work, against such a background of difficulties, have done a creditable job. And just how well they have done that is a truth which emerges from the variety of letters that come encapsulated in this work.
Take the first letter here. Writing to his mother from Rajshahi on 29 March 1971, the young Babul speaks of a tortuous battle between the Pakistan army and the Bengali police. “Yesterday”, he writes, "a severe battle took place between the police and the army. In the end, we could not win." The sense of despair is palpable. It is a shame to go on living, he tells his mother, when so many others are being brutally murdered by the soldiers. Babul, whose real name is Kazi Nurunnabi, was fated not to witness the birth of his country. Abducted by the Pakistanis in October of that year, he was never seen again.
ABM Mahbubur Rahman was luckier. He joined the war and survived. On 5 April, he writes to his mother: "Mother, I know you wouldn't have let me go and that is why I am going away without telling you.” The sentiments are typical of many Bengali young men who went to the war. Parents, anxious that their children survived in the face of the Pakistani onslaught, nevertheless worried that they would march off to the war and lose their lives in battle. Rahman reassures his mother: “The day I can avenge the humiliation of our mothers and sisters and free this Golden Bengal of its enemies, I shall return to you.” And he did come back.
Sadder is the story of the very young Amanullah Chowdhury Farooq. A student of Class X at Chittagong City Collegiate School, Farooq was killed in battle days after writing to his father on 23 May 1971. Idealism gleams in his missive — and with that dash of unshakeable patriotism. As he tells his father, "I am going away today. I don't know where I am going. I know only that I am going where a bold, freedom-loving child of Bangladesh should be going.” A little further on, he puts the rhetorical question to the man who has sired him, "If today your eldest son Farooq has decided to wage war against injustice and in the course of that struggle loses his life, will you feel sad, Father?” He speaks of his dreams of going on to college after school and then to university. And yet he knows that minus freedom all dreams are pointless. He recalls a quote in English, "Mother and motherland are superior to heaven."
There is then the letter Rumi writes to his uncle from Agartala on 16 June. It is briskly written, a sign of the hurry he is in to get on with the job of getting into battle mode again. He tells his Pasha Mama, "We are fighting a just war. We shall win. Pray for us all. I don't know what to write . . . there is so much to write about. But every tale of atrocity you hear, every picture of terrible destruction that you see is true. They have tom into us with a savagery unparalleled in human history." If Rumi spoke for the young, Akhlaqul Hossain Ahmed symbolized in his own way the dilemma before the political class. Elected a Member of Parliament (the editors nfortunatcly do not say if he was elected to the national or provincial assembly), Ahmed writes to his wife Hcna from Mahadeo on 16 June: "It is my prayer to Allah that all of you stay well.. I am passing through many lands . . There is pleasure in travelling, but when I think of you all, my heart breaks." On 16 July, Ataur Rahman Khan Kaiser, subsequently a senior Awami League politician and diplomat. writes to his baby daughter: “My child, 1 write this letter for the day when God-willing you will learn to read, to understand. Surely there is much sadness in your tiny chest . . . Why doesn't daddy come to see you? My child, today on your birthday your father is unable to gather you to his bosom; It is a sadness that will not go away from your father's life.”
Ekattorer Chithi, when you read through the letters, recreates the terrifying times that would eventually give way to freedom. But more searing is the pain which comes of the knowledge that life for an entire nation had collapsed in a heap, had meshed with disaster of an unmitigated sort. Sons writing to their worried parents, fathers writing to their children, husbands writing to their wives, brothers writing to brothers, brothers-in-law writing to sisters-in-law --- all of these are a backdrop to the devastation that goes on in a land under brutal foreign occupation. Three days before the Pakistani forces surrender to the joint command of the Indian army and the Mukti Bahini, Anwar Hossain (subsequently to be an academic at Dhaka University) writes to LutfaTaher, wife of the war-wounded Colonel Abu Taher, from Lucknow: “Bhaijan is quite all right. The journey from Gauhati to Siliguri was enjoyable . . . Bhai only talked about you, wanted to know why we hadn't brought you along.”
Those last lines make you wonder. It was free Bangladesh that was to claim Taher's life in 1976, along with scores of others. It was free Bangladesh that would see Anwar Hossain humiliated by shadowy men in an eerie darkness we might as well describe as caretaker emergency.
From tempestuous youth to founding father...
Sheikh Mujib: Bangladesher Aar Ek Naam Atiur Rahman Dipti Prokashoni
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman is often referred to by his admirers as the greatest Bengali of all times. That, to some, may sound like an exaggeration. The fact, though, is that his contributions to a transformation of the lives of his people, indeed of their history, remains the one point where no one else has edged ahead of him. And it has especially been since his assassination in August 1975 that literature on him has proliferated on a scale unprecedented in the tales of nations.
Atiur Rahman's work is part of that literature. The question that could now arise, however, is: Why this need for a new biography on the late leader? This work is fundamentally a panegyric on Bangabandhu and is obviously geared to placing him in the proper historical perspective. But that is a job which other writers before Rahman have already done. Besides, there have been the innumerable articles, poetry and documentaries that have constantly reflected the life and times of the founder of Bangladesh. Of course, there will be more, considering the hold he has always had on the psyche of his people. But there then comes the matter of superfluity. To what extent does Atiur Rahman’s work diverge from those of others? And, remember, those earlier writers too have come forth with laudatory works on Mujib. Which begs the question: Isn't it time for a critical look at the Mujib era, for a wholesome and probing observation of the times in which he dominated the life of his nation?
An answer to that question could be that martyrs (and Bangabandhu was a martyr, in every accepted sense of conviction and tradition) are generally not held up to critical study. Those that love them fundamentally revere them. Those who don't often fall for the temptation of going captious and being parochial in their assessments. Both aspects of Mujib study have been noted in Bangladesh, though the scales have generally and naturally been heavier In favour of the murdered leader It is from such a perspective that this work can be approached. The author, like nearly everyone else in the Bengali intellectual camp, reveres Mujib for the unrelenting struggle he waged in forging a clear sense of Bengali nationalism in the 1960s. That is understandable enough, for Mujib remains the one man whose courage of conviction and absolute refusal to kowtow before or compromise with what used to be the West Pakistani militarycivilian bureaucratic complex have never been matched by anyone else before or after him. That said, an extremely powerful reason for this new work is clearly, without Atiur Rahman having to remind us, the many manipulations that have gone on since 1975 to distort Bangladesh's history and Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's pre-eminent role in its creation.
Sheikh Mujib is, in that broad sense, a study of not just a man but of the free state that was to be an offshoot of his dreams. Behind the assertive, principled politics of the man dwelled a dreamer. And it was as far back as 1957, when his mentor Huseyn Shahced Suhrawardy occupied the office of Pakistan's prime minister, that Mujib wondered aloud before him if East Pakistan could not break away from the rest of the country to be an independent nation. Suhrawardy, appalled, reprimanded him and reminded him of the raison d'etre --- the Muslim homeland idea --- behind the creation of Pakistan. By 1961, however, Mujib's thoughts were increasingly moving in the direction of freedom, and for good reason. Pakistan's democratic aspirations had been rudely shattered by the military coup of October 1958. It was then but natural that the ardent nationalist in Mujib would manifest itself. It did barely eight years later, in 1966. The path to Bengali emancipation, so Mujib reasoned, lay through a transformation of the Pakistan state into a confederation on the basis of his autonomy-oriented Six Point programme.
What transpired after 1966 is now part of history. It is a story that has been told many times over. Atiur Rahman tells it again, but with somewhat a difference. The various sections in his work are arranged around a cluster of themes which bring together the various aspects of Bangabandhu's personality as an individual, as a politician and as a statesman. These sections trace Mujib's graduation from the tempestuousness of youth to the somber reality of providing leadership to the Bengali middle class. And beyond. The point is simple and ineffable: Sheikh Mujibur Rahman evolved, through all the volatility and unpredictability of Pakistani politics, as the unchallenged representative of the Bengalis by his sheer dedication to a cause. Vacuous rhetoric, a weapon men like Zulfikar Ali Bhutto were to use, was not for him. Neither was temptation, a weakness that quite felled giants like A.K. Fazlul Huq, part of his journey to political stardom. Unlike Moulana Bhashani, unpredictability never had any place in Mujib's scheme of things. His was a gradual, and graduated, scaling of the heights.
And this evolving man shines through in the chapters into which Atiur Rahman segments his work. The 1971 noncooperation movement, the declaration of independence, the shaping of independent Bangladesh's foreign policy, national economic formulations and attitudes to culture and heritage are the ideas the author throws up to explain the Sheikh Mujibur Rahman persona. And he adds, for good measure, thoughts on agriculture that Mujib and Rabindranath Tagore expended. And why Tagore? Atiur Rahman, in the manner of sd many others and with justification, considers Tagore and Mujib two of the pivotal points of reference in Bengali history.
The appendices should provide useful material for future researchers on Bangladesh's history. Bangabandhu's significant speeches, the proclamation of independence at Mujibnagar, details of the 21-point programme of 1954, the Six Point programme of 1966 and the Eleven Point programme of 1969 are all presented in a pack, which is a cheering thought. A small note, though: the author mentions 23 September 1974 as the day when Bangabandhu spoke at the United Nations General Assembly. In point of fact, he did so two days later, on 25 September, as the records show.
In the transparent waters of the Meghna...
Commercial History of Dhaka is more than a commercial affair. It certainly transcends its title, by going into an exposition of the history of the city in its various social and political aspects. With preparations afoot for the four hundredth anniversary celebrations of what is today Bangladesh's capital, this gigantic compendium (and you could really call it that) brings forth the many diverse and intriguing paths history has taken in the shaping of the city.
In a society where politics is generally the staple ol regular conversation, to the near exclusion of everything else, save perhaps poetry, conversations on trade and commerce are few and far between. Now, if you add to that fact a bit ol the history behind such commercial activities, you are likely to come up against a wall of silence, or almost. This work, corn Ing from the Dhaka Chamber of Commerce and Industry, breaks that silence. It docs so through bringing to readers the details behind the rise of Dhaka and the position, albeit a suffocatingly modern one, it enjoys today.
Begin at the beginning, with Sirajul Islam's enumeration of the tale behind the gradual emergence of the city. He informs us, in his rich essay, that Dhaka enjoyed a reputation far beyond the region of which it has been a part as far back as the times of the historian Pliny. The Roman is presumed to have died in AD 113, but in his lifetime he recorded the presence of Dhaka's textiles in the Mediterranean trade.' That was in 73 AD. That might well cause confusion (or readers, on the strength of the knowledge that Dhaka was officially established in 1608 or 1610, in any case in the three years between 1608 and 1610. If Pliny did hear of Dhaka or speak of it, should we assume that the city was only then beginning to sprout from rather raw beginnings? And if it did, does it not make sense to press the argument that embryonic Dhaka took shape long before it became known as Jahangirnagar?
Be that as it may, Sirajul Islam moves on to record Dhaka's pre-eminence in the times before the arrival of the British colonial power. Its chief product of trade was cotton. Yarn was bleached in the transparent waters of the Meghna, which is of course some insight into the pristine nature amidst which the city and its inhabitants lived. Dhaka muslin, today more a memory than a reality, served as an item of global trade in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The principal buyers of muslin were of course members of royalty in Asia and Europe. Islam does not stay confined to narrating the positive about the city. He makes note of the floods that left farmers in a quandary through the destruction wrought on their aman and rabi crops in 1787. Earlier, in 1763, while at war with Mir Qasim, the English sacked the city and so left a once prosperous economy battered.
Mizanur Rahman Shelley sheds a different sort of light on Dhaka through recording what he sees as some major shifts in its industrial and commercial life. Bernier and Tavernier, he notes, were enthused by thoughts of 'Bengal’s plenty and prosperity' which they believed would draw the attention of the business classes abroad. Tavernier visited Dhaka. Sometime in 1669, an English trading agency was set up in the Dhaka suburb of Tejgaon. The French were permitted to set up a gunj or market in the city. Such developments notwithstanding, Dhaka's textile industry was to go through a debilitating phase between the early and mid-19* century with the import of machine-manufactured cotton products from Britain. The local cotton industry simply collapsed. Despite that, Shelley notes, Dhaka's population shot up to 68,000 in 1840, transforming it into one of the 'more populous urban centres in Bengal.'
Shelley's study encompasses the rise of jute, the emergence of the boat building
Commercial History of Dhaka Edit Delwar Hassan Dhaka Chamber of Commerce & Industry
industry and the inception of local finance and banking. When you add to that Sharif uddin Ahmed's history of Dhaka's artisans, craftsmen and professional classes, you cannot but wonder at the heritage which today underpins the city. From Ahmed you come by invaluable information on such social presences as those of aratdars, baniks, coolies, dalals, darjis, darogahs and dhunaris. And then there is more. Kalu, kamar, majhec, moyra, muchi, patial, patua, poddar, shankari, et al, are all explications of the professions which have contributed to the making of Dhaka over the centuries.
There are other essays here which in composite manner hold up Dhaka as a historically thriving city of trade and commerce. The work thus reinforces the argument that the city has not always been a rural backwater. That is a powerful enough reason for renewed pride in the evolution of the city, despite the urban jungle it may well have become by now.
Syed Badrul Ahsan Is Editor, Current Affairs, The Daily Star.