& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

Architecture

A new Paris, as dreamed by planners
Hand it to the French. Who else would pick an economic collapse as a time to unveil one of the most audacious urban plans in recent memory?
Yet the 10 proposals for a new master plan for metropolitan Paris, which were unveiled last week, may just be the kind of brazen idealism the world needs right now.
The results of a nine-month study commissioned by President Nicolas Sarkozy, the proposals aim to transform Paris and its surrounding suburbs into the first sustainable “post-Kyoto city," a reference to the treaty on climate change, with an expanded M£tro system and sprawling new parks.
The government has yet to say how it would raise the money to build this new city. And Sarkozy's opponents, who have sometimes dismissed him as “President Bling-Bling,” have questioned whether this is anything more than an elaborate publicity stunt.
But even if none of the proposals are ever built, they show a daring that has not been seen in aWestern city for decades. Tlie teams range in experience from well-established international stars like Richard Rogers and Christian de Portzamparc to French architects who are just beginning their careers. All forsook flashy imagery for a deep analysis of the city's diverse
communities and the fraying tissue that binds them together. At the very least, the results should force a radical reappraisal of Paris's identity. The enchanted city most of us know through holidays and films is a com-
sustainable city, and to break down the isolation between the outlying neighbourhoods and the historic centre.
Among the most audacious is de Portzamparc's plan, which proposes
pact metropolis of roughly two million people that lies within the peripherique, the elevated freeway that encircles the old city.
But for decades the vast majority of Parisians have lived in the generic apartment blocks and squalid housing projects that make up most of the suburbs.
The aim of the study was twofold: to create a plan for a greener, more
demolishing both the Gare du Nord and the Gare de 1'Est and replacing them with a single massive European train station just outside the city centre. The station would link to the Eurostar train lines to London and Brussels, as well as to a new elevated maglev train that would run above the peripherique. It would also anchor a towering new global business district, a rival to La Defense.
Rogers's plan is equally ambitious. Noting that the tracks that connect to the city's main train stations cut Paris into wedges, like slices of a pie, he proposes burying them all underground. A vast system of public parks would be draped over these new underground tracks, connecting poor and middle-class neighbourhoods.
Other plans are more poetic. Jean Nouvel proposes creating a green belt that would circle the entire city. All future construction would be concentrated inside this belt, adding density to what are now sprawling, isolated communities. New towers would punctuate some of the outlying boulevards, adding visual markers where there are none. The outer ring would become a sort of 620-mile-long community garden, with residents tending their plots along an endless string of parks and fields.
Yet all of the projects recognise the strong link between urban policy and social equality In tying environmental concerns to issues of identity, they suggest ways to begin reversing the growing social divisions that mark the contemporary city. If they inspire a broader global debate on these tensions, they will already have accomplished something of significant value.
Source: The New York Times