& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

Desperate bid for judicial power

Admin cadres lobbying hard with policymakers to regain clout

Shakhawat Liton
Executive magistrates, cadres of the admin service, are pressing hard for getting back the power to take cognisance of offences fortrial.
They lost the authority in separation of the judiciary from the executive in 2007.
Leaders of Bangladesh Administrative Service Association are lobbying government policymakers to meet the demand, said sources.
They are trying to convince the high-ups that the executive magistrates should be able to take judicial note of some offences to keep the administration active and promote good governance’.
If the magistrates from admin are authorised to take cognisance of offences, the judicial magistrates will complete the rest of the trial proceedings.
The cognisance signifies acceptance of an offence to be sent fortrial.
Bangladesh Judicial Service Association says returning the authority to executive magistrates would undermine the spirit of an independent judiciary.
Administrative service leaders have already met members ol the parliamentary standing committee on law, justice and par liamentary affairs, and requested them to reinstate the cxccutiv< magistrates' cognisance power.
FROM PAGE i
The standing committee, assigned to scrutinise the bill to introduce laws on separation ot the judiciary, will hear both sides at a meeting today, said Abdul Matin Khasru, a member of the committee and former law minister.
Talking to The Daily Star yesterday, he said,"We won’t go beyond the framework of the historic judgment on judiciary separation and article 22 of the constitution.”
In April 2007, the immediate past caretaker government promulgated two ordinances amending the Code of Criminal Procedure to separate the judiciary from the executive in light of the Supreme Court directives.
The ordinances took effect on November 1 that year.
Despite being recom-njended by the special committee of parliament for ratification, the ordinances ceased to have effect on February 25, as they were not ratified within the stipulated timelimit.
Later though, the government tabled a bill in parliament to enact laws necessary for continuation of the separation. The bill has been sent to the parliamentary standing committee on law ministry for scrutiny.
At a meeting last Thursday, the standing committee decided to seek both admin and judicial service officials' opinions on the matter.
Administrative cadres had been bitterly opposed to separation of the judiciary.
The separation stripped the executive magistrates of the authority to take cognisance of offences and hold trial
It also restricted their powers to issuing search and arrest warrants, committing someone in custody, ordering measures tp keep the peace and disperse unlawful assembly, and giving immediate injunctions in case of public nuisance.