International trade analysts yesterday stressed regionalisation of transit in South Asia to benefit the countries such as Bangladesh, Bhutan, India and Nepal.

TYansport is a basic instrument in trade and South Asia has the potential to benefit from it, but most countries in the region lack a "true political will", they said.

However, they believe India, as the largest country in South Asia, will play an "instrumental role" in creating a positive economic relationship with its neighbours.

"Bangladesh should take the transit issue dispassionately," Nazneen Ahmed, a research fellow of Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, said in her presentation at an international seminar on "Political economy of trade liberalisation in South Asia” at Dhaka Sheraton Hotel.

"Bilateral and multilateral agreements must be signed immediately among the countries involved to reap benefit from transit." she said.

"Many things depend on the role of a big country," said economist Dr Atiur Rahman, who also spoke at the seminar.

South Asian Network on Economic Modelling (SANEM) and CUTS International, India have coorganised the two-day seminar that focuses on how to channel interna-

tional trade into national development in South Asian countries.

The world has been witnessing a growing regionalisation trend for the past two decades to maximise the benefits, but the tiling is different for South Asians.

There have been many talks among the South Asian countries for years on the utilisation of transit, broadly referring to water, rail and road transpons. But there is no tangible progress so far on the issue.

Bangladesh signed transit agreements with Bhutan in 1980 and with Nepal in 1976, but the deals remain

unutilised because of Bangladesh's 'no' to transit to India. India has been asking Bangladesh to allow transit for years.

“For Bangladesh it is sensitive. It fears losing sovereignty to a 23-times-bigger India, which is also surrounding Bangladesh on three sides,” Nazneen Ahmed said.

On the other hand, she said: “This fear is aggravated by the history of India's overbearing attitude in many unresolved bilateral issues, including the water sharing of the Ganges river."

The researcher blamed both

India and Pakistan for their reluc- • tance to take care of the matters of ; the neighbours seriously.

She said neighbours always expect i India to "alley their insecurity" by ; making concessions to their needs.

Dr Atiur Rahman said India should know that its neighbours : lack even in negotiating capacity.

"The bargaining capacities of : Bangladesh and Nepal are not at the same level with India," Rahman said. ;

Abid Suleri, executive director of i Islamabad-based think-tank SDPI, i emphasised a 'real political will' to : reap benefit from the potentials of i South Asian nations.

Subhashini Abeysinghe, an econ- ’ omist at the Ceylon Chamber of Commerce in Sri Lanka, said her ; country is not benefiting from the . bilateral free trade agreement with ; India. "Local companies fear losing ; business to large Indian companies." ;

Pramod Dev, a policy analyst at ; CUTS International, India, said trade ; liberalisation could make significant ■ cuts in poverty in the region.

Most of tiie South Asian coun- ; tries started comprehensive trade ; reforms in the early 1990s. The ; reforms included a substantial = reduction of tariffs.

But the economy of the region is ; still saddled with one of the least ; liberal trade policy regimes in the ; world, reflected in their ranks near ; the bottom on the Trade and Tariff ; Restrictiveness Index.