& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

Stanford tie uncertain

AfP, St John's
The world's richest cricket match the 20-million-dollar Stanford Super Series clash here on November 1 may be abandoned without a ball being bowled because of a commercial row.
The Stanford organisers and Digicel, the multi-million dollar sponsors of the West Indies Cricket Board (WICB), are locked in a row over commercial rights at the match being played at the Stanford Cricket Ground.
Digicel believes its five-year deal with the WICB includes the match, which features the Stanford Superstars taking on Kevin Pietersen's England, as it is offi-
daily backed by the board; the Stanford organisers claim as the Superstars are not an official side it is outside any existing sponsorship deal.
"The International Cricket Council (ICC) and the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) have confirmed that they do not consider the Stanford Superstars team to be a West Indies team," said a Stanford statement.
"The Superstars team is selected solely by Stanford 20/20 and Stanford 20/20 is not willing to gift to Digicel valuable rights to which it is simply not entitled and which Stanford 20/20 intends to sell as part of a presenting sponsor package for the Stanford Super Series."
The proposed 1\venty20 match, where each member of thc winning
team is set to win a million dollars, has already been the subject of legal action at London's High Court, where an arbitration hearing is set to take place early next month.
This latest commercial fall-opt comes just days after claims that two players from the squad created by Texan billionaire Allen Stanford, including a West Indies batsman, had failed drugs tests.
West Indies Cricket Board chief executive Donald Peters has objected to media reports linking him to confirmation of the alleged ' positive tests.
"We cannot confirm anything because we have no formal reports that the players were ever tested, and the Stanford people have not informed us who the players were, so we are not able to confirm it," Peters said.
"An Indian reporter contacted me about the matter, and the next thing I know, I see this report on a website quoting me, so I will have to ask for a retraction and, hopefully, it can be dealt with speedily."
Since no formal notification has been received from the Stanford group, Peters explained the WICB could not proceed with any sanc-
But if any player was found guilty of a positive test, action would be taken by the regional governing body following legal advice.
"This is the normal course of action should someone return a positive test, since the WICB does indeed have a disciplinary process in place for anti-dopingcases."
I Ie added the WICB would also need to consult with their lawyers, since this was a unique case, with the players in the Stanford Superstars side not directly under the supervision of the board.