& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

A self-inflicted wound

Jacob F. Kirkegaahd
***Instead, US high-skilled immigration policies have in recent years become tangibly more restrictive -• waylaid by wider congressional gridlock on immigration and political emphasis on indiscriminate enforcement. This restrictiveness is relative to earlier periods in US history and other industrialised countries today. In April 2008, about half of 163,000 US businesses wishing to hire a foreign high-skilled worker were denied this opportunity by the annual quota of 85,000 - 65,000 plus 20,000 available to foreign graduates with advanced degrees from US universities — available visas.***
America rose to global economic prominence, superpower status and victory in the Cold War on the shoulders of the most highly skilled workforce in the world. However, America's global "skills leadership" is now under challenge.
An increasingly vicious combination of long-term trends in the form of retiring baby boomers and stagnating US educational attainment, combined with increasingly restrictive laws on high-skilled immigration increasingly undermines US _ position. This will seriously jeopar-
dize long-term economic growth opportunities, especially for US high-tech sectors.
Aging US baby boomers were the best-educated workers in the world when they entered the workforce 30-some years ago. Building on visionary policies like the GI Bill of 1944, college-level graduation rates for US baby boomers reached almost 40 percent during this period, far exceeding graduation rates of 20 to 25 percent enjoyed by contemporary British, French, German or Japanese baby boom generations in the late 1960s and 1970s.
The year 2008 is the first in which Americans bom after World War II can retire with public pensions --hence, the loss of large numbers of well-educated baby boomers will be more severely felt in the United States.
Another worry is the stagnation seen in the average educational attainment of Americans. Almost uniquely in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the tertiary-level graduation rates among presentday US labour market entrants is the same as that of their baby boomer parents - stuck below 40 percent. Hence, there’s a riskin coming years that as many high-skilled Americans will retire as will the enter the workforce.
Moreover, while America failed improve broad educational standards, the rest of the world has not stood still. Today, over 50 percent of young Canadians, Japanese and Koreans obtain tertiary education representing a vast educational advancement relative to their parents'generation.
American labour market entrants today barely make the global skills top-10 list. As a direct result, for the first time in generations, the US risks becoming less skill-abundant than an increasing number of its global economic competitors.
US and Canadian baby boomers, aged 55 to 64, were indeed the "brightest kids on the global trading block," when they entered the workforce and rapidly globalising marketplace.
Thus baby boomers were ready to take advantage of trade liberalisation and the opening of
global markets during the last part of the 20th century, far less true for today's American youth.
Policymakers cannot stop the graying of the US population or the imminent retirement of baby boomers. Similarly, successful overhaul of the US education sector could only begin to reverse more than 30 years of educational stagnation over the longterm.
Improving the education system is hardly a realistic or quick solution to forestalling broad skill shortages in the US economy over the next decade.
US policymakers can only hope to counter these long-term phenomena by reforming high -skilled immigration policies and facilitating the continued and increasingly economically necessary inflow of high-skilled workers from abroad.
Instead, US high-skilled immigration policies have in recent years become tangibly more restrictive --waylaid by wider congressional gridlock on immigration and political emphasis on indiscriminate enforcement. This restrictiveness is relative to earlier periods in US history and other industrialised countries today.
In April 2008, about half of 163,000 US businesses wishing to hire a foreign high-skilled worker were denied this opportunity by the annual quota of 85.000 - 65,000 plus 20,000 available to foreign graduates with advanced degrees from US universities - available visas.
The immigration policy undermines the economic characteristics - entrepreneurial vitality and mastery of new advanced technologies -- that make the US the envy of the world.
Just like Google, eBay and Yahoo, more than half of engineering and technology companies founded in Silicon Valley from 1995 to 2005 had at least one foreign-born founder, more than a third of US venture capital-backed technology firms report shifting investments and jobs outside the country due to restrictive regulation and America's largest, most competitive companies cannot get visas for foreign high-
skilled workers they want to hire
Meanwhile, contours of the global battlefield for talent are rapidly changing. The recent proposal for an EU "Blue Card" would allow high-skilled workers from outside the EU to work in multiple EU countries, just one example of a new trend across the OECD. Affected by more rapid population aging than the US, other OECD countries aggressively work to liberalize their high-skilled immigration laws, while simultaneously tightening regulation of low-skilled and humanitarian-based immigration. Ironically, the other nations frequently copy US policies, particularly those that attract and retain foreign students.
Equally worrisome for the US, the top countries of origin for high-skilled migrants -- fast-growing China and India -- offer incentives for skilled workers to return home. In 2007, China launched its "green passage" initiative, aimed at luring back tens of thousands of acclaimed overseas Chinese scientists, engineers and executives with promises
of guaranteed university places for their children, exemption from household-residence registration --or hokou — requirements and tax benefits.
The US — historically the world’s country of choice for foreign high-skilled workers — has the most to lose from any change in these human-capital flows. While the rest of the rich world has caught up in welcoming high-skilled foreigners, the US could soon struggle to attract global talent
With the skill-base of the US workforce declining at an accelerating pace relative to the rest of the world. America in the 21st century will need foreign high-skilled workers more than ever. At stake is the ability of the US economy to thrive in the global marketplace.
Jacob F. Kirkegaard is a research associate al the Peterson Institute for Intemabcxul Economics and author of The Acceerahng Deci ne Amencas High-Skilled Workforce: Implications for Immigration Policy ‘
©Yale Center for the Study of G'obatabon A* rights reserved Reprinted by arrangement