& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

Gilly's matter of timing

Internet, undated
Adam Gilchrist has been a one-man wrecking crew through a glorious Test career now into its I Oth year.
But the national selectors and the man dubbed a once-in-a-generation talent must now ensure his retirement does not destroy the foundations he helped to build.
Gilchrist onMondaysaidhehas no. intention of quitting Test cricket, meaning a fourth tour of England next year was not out of the question.
When you have meant as much to cricket on and off the field as he has, you deserve to go out on your own terms.
Gilchrist deserves to join the elite club of only 10 Australians to have clocked a century of Tests, a milestone he should reach in the Caribbean midway through the
But then the selectors will no doubt contemplate life without a man who has changed the role wicketkeepers can have in the
game
They must ask: If Gilchrist plays through another home summer at age 37, will he still be the right man for the job come the showcase event that will be the 2009 Ashes series?
If not, New South Welshman Brad Haddin -- the man Gilchrist says is his successor -- must be handed a baggy green cap next summer.
That's only fair for Fladdin, who would then have six Tests at home and tour of Soudi Africa to prepare for England.
At 30, Haddin -- who even earns a spot in the Australian one-day team as a specialist batsman - - is at the peak of his powers. His time Is now.
Gilchrist has no intention of holding up a younger talent.
This would not serve anyone well - - least of all an Australian side desperate to retain its No. 1 ranking.
But until Gilchrist announces his retirement, the question will bum -- has he gone on for too long?
And relations with the selectors during a player's twilight years can quickly turn messy, even nasty.
Ian Healy wanted a final Test at the Gabba in 1999 before retiring, but the selectors said no. Healy and selection chairman 'lYevor Hohns didn’t talk foryears.
Steve Waugh and 1 lohns had a frosty relationship in fire former captain's final year.
The selectors wanted Waugh out after the 2002-03 Ashes scries. Waugh wanted another year, and --largely because of his standing in the ga me - - had his way.
Was it good for Australian cricket?That's debatable.
Shane Warne was full of theatre through his glorious career, but last summer as he said so often -- his "scriptwriter" couldn't have penned a better ending.
Warne wanted to go out with petrol in the tank, rather than limping across the line. He knew his time was up, even though others thought he had years left in the game.
A 5-0 Ashes whitewash capped it off.
Gilchrist deserves a similar ending. While he and Warne may not be the best of mates, perhaps he could ask for the number of that scriptwriter.