On August 5, British Prime Minister Tony Blair announced stringent new measures to be taken by his government to combat terrorism. The approach Mr. Blair outlined is a radical escalation in the war against terrorism and can be expected to have a significant impact, not only in the UK, but also perhaps in other countries around the world grappling with extremism. We feel that of the extraordinary sweep of the proposed measures and the seriousness of the implications for the future warrant the full text of Mr. Blair's address being reproduced below for our readers.

SiNCE 7 July the response of the British people has been unified, dignified, and remarkable. of course there is anxiety and worry. But the country knows the purpose of terrorism is to intimidate and it is not inclined to give in to such intimidation. of course, too, there have been isolated and unacceptable acts of a racial or religious hatred. But they have been isolated. By and large Britain knows it is a tolerant and good-natured nation, is rather proud of it, and has responded to this terrorism with tolerance and good nature in a way that has won the admiration of people and nations the world over.

However, i am acutely aware that alongside these feelings is also a determination that this very tolerance and good nature should not be abused by a small, but fanatical minority; and an anger that it has been.

Time and again, over the past few weeks, i have been asked to deal firmly with those prepared to engage in such extremism; and most particularly those who incite it or proselytise it. The Muslim community are our partners in this endeavour. Much of the insistence on strong action to weed out extremism is coming most vigorously from Muslims themselves, deeply concerned lest the activities of the fanatical fringe should contaminate the good reputation of the mainstream community.

Such action in the past has been controversial. Each tightening of the law has met fierce opposition. Regularly we have had defeat in Parliament or the courts. The AntiTerrorism legislation, passed in 2001 after September 11th was declared partially invalid. The successor legislation hotly contested.

But, for obvious reasons, the mood now is different. People do not talk of "scare-mongering." To be fair, the Conservative leadership

has responded with a genuine desire to work together for the good of the country as have the Liberal Democrats.

over the past two weeks, intensive meetings across government have taken place to set a comprehensive framework for action in dealing with the terrorist threat in Britain. Today i want to give your our preliminary assessment of the measures we need urgently to examine.

in the meantime, insofar as administrative measures, not requiring legislation, can be taken, we will act with immediate effect.

in looking both at the law and administrative measures, we have surveyed extensively practice in other countries, including in particular other European countries. There will be a series of consultation papers over the coming weeks starting with a research paper that will detail experience in other countries. There will also be a cross

government unit staffed by senior hand-picked officials to drive this forward framework for action under the guidance of Bill Jeffrey, the intelligence and Security Coordinator and the Cabinet Committee on Counter Terrorism which i chair. The Home Secretary with whom i have been talking closely in the past week, will have the Cabinet responsibility for coordinating this.

Here are the measures either being taken now, immediately, or under urgent examination.

1. The Home Secretary today publishes new grounds for deportation and exclusion.

Deportation is a decision taken by the Home Secretary under statute.

The new grounds will include

fostering hatred, advocating

violence to further a person's beliefs, or justifying or validating such violence. These grounds will be subject to a short consultation period which will finish in August. Even under existing grounds, we

are today signalling a new approach to deportation orders. Let no one be in any doubt. The rules of the game are changing.

These cases will, of course, be tested in the courts. Up to now, the concern has been that orders for deportation will be struck down as contrary to Article 3 of the ECHR, as interpreted by the European Court in the Chahal case in 1996; and indeed have had such cases struck down.

However, the circumstances of our national security have now self-evidently changed and we believe we can get the necessary assurances from the countries to which we will return the deportees, against their being subject to torture or ill-treatment contrary to Article 3. We have concluded a Memorandum of Understanding with Jordan and are close to getting necessary assurances from other relevant countries. For example, i have had very constructive conversations

yesterday with the leaders of Algeria and Lebanon. There are around 10 such countries with whom we are seeking such assurances.

France and Spain, to name just two other European countries, do deport by administrative decision. The effect is often immediate and in some cases the appeal is non-suspensive, i.e. it takes place outside the country. The assurances given by the receiving nation are adequate for their courts and these countries are also subject to the ECHR and apply it directly.

So it is important to test this anew now, in view of the changed conditions in Britain. Should legal obstacles arise, we will legislate further, including, if necessary amending the Human Rights Act, in respect of the interpretation of the ECHR. in any event, we will consult on legislating specifically for a non-suspensive appeal process in respect of deportations.

one other point on deportations. once the new grounds take effect, there will be a list drawn up of

specific extremist web-sites, bookshops, centres, networks, and particular organisations of concern. Active engagement with any of these will be a trigger for the Home Secretary to consider the deportation of any foreign national.

2. As has been stated already, there will be new anti-terrorism legislation in the Autumn. This will include an offence of condoning or glorifying terrorism. The sort of remarks made in recent days should be covered by such laws. But this will also be applied to justifying or glorifying terrorism anywhere, not just in the UK.

3. Anyone who has participated in terrorism or has anything to do with it anywhere will automatically be refused asylum.

4. We have already powers to strip citizenship from those individuals with British or dual nationality who act in a way that is contrary to the interests of this country. We will now consult on extending these, applying them to naturalised citizens engaged in

extremism and making the procedures simpler and more effective.

5. Cases such as Rashid Ramda, wanted for the Paris metro bombing ten years ago and who is still in the UK whilst France seeks extradition, are completely unacceptable. We will begin consultation, on setting a maximum time limit for all future extradition cases involving terrorism.

6. We are already examining a new court procedure which would allow a pre-trial process. We will also examine whether the necessary procedure to give us a way of meeting the police and security service request that detention pre-charge of terrorist suspects be significantly extended.

7. For those who are British nationals and who cannot be deported, we will extend the use of control orders. Any breach can mean imprisonment.

8. To expand the court capacity necessary to deal with this and other related issues, the Lord Chancellor will increase the number of special judges hearing such cases.

9. We will proscribe Hizb-ut-Tahrir and the successor organisation of Al Mujahiroun. We will also examine the grounds of proscription to widen them and put proposals forward in the new legislation.

10. it is now necessary, in order to acquire British citizenship, that people attend a citizenship ceremony, swear allegiance to the country, and have a rudimentary grasp of the English language. We will review the threshold for this to make sure it is adequate and we will establish, with the Muslim community, a commission to advise on how, consistent with people's complete freedom to worship in the way they want, and to follow their own religion and culture, there is better integration of those parts of the community presently inadequately integrated. i have asked Hazel Blears to make this part of the work she is currently undertaking.

11. We will consult on a new power to order closure of a place of worship which is used as a centre for fomenting extremism and will consult with Muslim leaders in respect of those clerics who are not British citizens, to draw up a list of those not suitable to preach who will

be excluded from Britain.

12. We will bring forward the proposed measures on the security of our borders, with a series of countries specifically designated for bio-metric visas over the next year. Meanwhile, the Home office and Foreign and Commonwealth office are compiling an international database of those individuals whose activities or views pose a threat to Britain's security. Anyone on the database will be excluded from entry with any appeal only taking place outside the country.

We will consult widely on these measures, including the other political parties. This is evidently a heavy agenda to take forward. But it is necessary. Let me also make it clear. if legislation can be made ready in time and the right consensus is achieved, we are ready to recall Parliament in September, at least to begin the debate over the measures.

i want to make it clear, yet again, that this is not in any sense aimed at the decent, law-abiding Muslim community of Britain. We know this fringe does not truly represent islam. We know British Muslims in general abhor the actions of the extremists. We acknowledge Muslim contribution to our country and welcome it; welcome those who visit in peace; welcome those who know that in this country, the respect and tolerance towards others, which we believe in, is the surest guarantee of freedom and progress for people of all religious faiths.

But, coming to Britain is not a right. And even when people have come here, staying here carries with it a duty. That duty is to share and support the values that sustain the British way of life. Those that break that duty and try to incite hatred or engage in violence against our country and its people, have no place here. over the coming months, in the courts, in Parliament, in debate and engagement with all parts of our communities, we will work to turn those sentiments into reality. That is my duty as Prime Minister.