& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

That Liverpool pull

LIVERPOOL
It seems there is just no leaving of Liverpool for some people. Steven Gerrard realised as much in the small hours of Wednesday morning when, sitting in his living room with head pounding and mind a blur, the full implications of his proposed defection to Chelsea sank in.
"It just hit me," Gerrard said. "I didn't want to let go of what I'd worked so hard for since I was eight years old. When it came to leaving, I just couldn't."
For those who gathered at the gates of Liverpool's Melwood training ground prepared to spit their disgust at their former favourite, confirmation of his change of heart prompted unbridled delight.
The graffiti scrawled on the walls - "Judas" and "traitor" - were hurriedly wiped down, the player's eventual arrival at the training ground at about 1.15pm prompting whoops of glee where, only a few hours previously, there had been snarling discontent.
Yet there remains an underlying sense of bafflement. The farce that had been allowed to rage since the weekend, from the breakdown of contract talks to Gerrard's transfer request via
Liverpool's rejection of a £ 32 million ($76m) bid from Chelsea, has left a scar.
After last summer's similar shenanigans were forgiven by many, the captain may now have to learn to live with deep-rooted scepticism for a while. Most on Merseyside are still trying to comprehend how a local lad who lifted the European Cup only six weeks ago could ever contemplate leaving.
Even Gerrard, drained by the trauma, seemed perplexed as to how a simple breakdown in communication could have escalated into a full-scale crisis.
"I'm not proud of what happened, but there was confusion and doubt in my mind," he said.
"I actually thought that I would be offered a new contract straight after the Champions League final. If I had been, none of this mess would have happened, but to get five or six weeks down the line without being offered a deal made me wonder whether I was wanted or not. I thought they might want to sell me."
Reports in the Spanish press that he was keen to join Real Madrid heightened his suspicion that stories were being leaked to pave the way for his departure by fuelling the many conspiracy theories.
Negotiations on a new deal, barely begun, were called off on
Monday and, with a transfer request lodged as soon as Chelsea had seen a British-record bid rejected, the relationship between club and captain seemed fractured forever.
"The longer it went on the more misunderstandings there were," Gerrard said. "I'd had discussions with the manager - not bust-ups -but nothing had been resolved.
"It was a mess. There were times when I thought I might have played my last game for the club, but I was being backed into a corner and had to push things on.
"I knew it was going to look as though I wanted to go, but at one stage I thought I had no choice. If I blame anyone it's myself. I admit I made mistakes, though the club have also apologised to me for letting the contract situation drag on."
Liverpool chief executive Rick Parry has since admitted he may have "misread" the England midfielder's attitude and, by doing so, had cast doubt over the club's enthusiasm to retain him.
With Chelsea confident they had finally prised their man from Anfield, and the Liverpool hierarchy coming to terms with a PR disaster, Wednesday's reconciliation was as abrupt as it was unexpected.