One of the 'holy' objectives of attacking Iraq was to get rid of its vast stock of WMD. Casualties of the Anglo-US axis were mainly Iraqi civilians, a fact confirmed by the scarcity of Iraqi military personnel in the list.

It was learnt from news media that the 'liberators' of Iraq has used bombs containing depleted uranium to the unarmed civilians of an Iraqi village. Immediate effects of this radioactive element were not elaborated by the Western media presumably because these are felt by the victims only. Later effects include cancers and childbirth with congenital malformed organs.

President Bush the main culprit of this civilisation-cleansing aggression was immediately shouting about breach of Geneva Convention when some of the captured aggressors were televised. I am eager to hear from 'the advocate of democracy and vendor of liberty' about this bombing. What kind of humane treatment does it constitute? Which convention is obeyed by this? That's why some-one finds similarity between Bush and Hitler.

M. U. Chowdhury, On e-mail