& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

Hypes Overshadow Hopes

By Ikram Seghal
South Asia was .1 region of endless conflicts between the various con-ligurations ot races and religions before
the British started their rule in India after the Battle of Plassey 1757. Internecine conflicts continued during the minority rule of the British period, local animosity was mostly focused on the British Raj, symbolizing the third great religions stamp on South Asia. Since the British departed in 1947, the conflicts have been more defined, some have even gone beyond the regional parameters e.g., the border problem between India and Burma as well as Burma and Bangladesh, the Afghan conflict, etc.
The Indian occupation of Hyderabad, Junagadh and Manawadar in September 1947 caused the first conflict. These were Hindu-majority areas with Muslim rulers. While the Nizam of Hyderabad had not sought accession to Pakistan, the Nawab of Junagadh did so. The media in India almost unanimously supported the military takeover termed as a "police action" as being a manifestation of the democratic right of the people. The media in Pakistan opposed the Indian initiative, the Srl Lankan and Nepalese media making no comment except to report. Bangladesh did not exist then and the Press in Bhutan and the Maldives was non-existent. The electronic media had still had some time before its arrival in the region.
The second major conflict was between India and Pakistan over Kashmir, also in 194 7 In this case, a Muslim-majority area was being ruled over by Maharajah Hari Singh, a Dogra. The Indian Press went volte-face on their arguments about democratic rights". Suspicions about the Maharajah s intentions (and that of the Indian government) provoked a revolt among the mainly Muslim populace. When partitioning Punjab the Radcliffe Award gave the Musllm-majority district of Gurdaspui to India, thus not only ensuring a passage to Kashmir from India from the railhead at Pathankot but also a festering dispute that rages even today. Quite contrary to what happened in Hyderabad and Junagadh. the Indian now held aloft on "Instrument of Accession". a 180 degree turnaround from its earlier position of democratic right of the people" only a month earlier in Hyderabad. The Press in both India and Pakistan failed to look at the Issues objectively and went on supporting, in Jingoistic language, the viewpoint of their own countries till the LiN-mandated ceasefire in 1948.
The swift invasion gave wrong signal about their mili-tary process to the Indian leaders’. with tragic consequences in the third major conflict, between India and China in 1962. Despite the animosity In Pakistan towards India, the basic affinity of the people made the Pakistani Press look with sympathy to the Indian cause, reporting the events as carried by the Indian Press which was universally and unabashedly
anti-Chinese. It was only when western analysts started to silt through the wreckage of the Hhidi-Chtnl Bhai Bhai edifice that it transpired that It was India which started the conflict by trying to correct border anomalies, thus inviting massive Chinese retaliation. Respected newspapers such as The Statesmen and The Times of India carried banner headlines
I’M order Jawans to throw the Chinese out", etc. Pre-empting the Indians, seizing large areas of North East Frontier Agency (NEFA) and Aksal Chin In Ladakh in a swift operation. China unilaterally then proceeded to pull back to its side of the McMohan Line, handing back all the captured Indian weapons and equipment as well as Indian PWs in their custody. Even today the Indian Press does not accept reality and goes on and on of being stabbed in the back.
The fourth major conflict In the region was in 1965, the opening round being fought in April in the Rann of Kutch Thereafter Operation Glbralter was launched from the Pakistan in early August. However it was when Operation Grand Slam was launched in Chamb-Akhnur that decided the Indians to cross the International border at Lahore on Sept 6. 1965. Obviously both the sides took their own respective official positions and quite a lot was lost in the fog of war. As the Pakistani Press became free over the years, both the genesis and conduct of Operation Glbralter came under severe criticism by print media persons of both civilian and service origins. From the Indian
side, objective war analysis was done to a small extent by defence analysts ol military origin However the vernacular Press on both the sides still maintain the strident propaganda unleased In 1965
The fifth and sixth major conflicts are inexorably Intertwined. In 1971, the Pakistan Army launched a pre-emptive strike In erstwhile East Pakistan to crush a possible uprising. At that time Pakistan's eastern wing was in virtual revolt. some of the local paramilitary forces and police personnel having taken up arms. However it was the pre-emptive action against units having majority of Bengali personnel that was an invitation for general revolt. Even today the fiction is stated that the Bengali regular army units revoltea first. The Press in Pakistan, under a military regime, toed the official line and gave a one-sided version to the population in the then west.
The Press in India on the other hand did give out the truth but then proceeded to embellish it so much that it strained credibility. I remember the trash dished out by Amrita Bazaar Patrlka in Agartala Jail. India was very much involved in the events leading up to March 1971 through the Research and Analytical Wing (RAW), then from March onwards through BSF personnel inside East Pakistan in an undeclared war. from April onwards by the regular Indian Army in various functions Including managing a PW Camp at Panagarh In West Bengal much
before the outbreak of actual hostilities in Dec 1971 Along with a 1000 others Including a dozen or so offices. I was Incarnated in Apartal Jail for some lime before being viewed to Panagarh PW Camp on 25 April. 1971. The national Press followed the official line till
Pakistan lost the war and had a change of government, it suited the Bhutto government to run down the military regime from whom they had taken over power.
The seventh major conflict took place on the Island of Sri Lanka in the early '80s. Even
though the conflict was of ethnic nature, the Indians were deeply involved in destabilising Sri Lanka, turning it from a Paradise into hell The Tamils are In majority in South India but are a minority by far In Sri Lanka. With support from sympathizers in Tamil Nadu, Srl Lankan Tamils set up training camps for various insurgency groups in Tamil Nadu The Insurrection came to a head In 1984 with the Indians imposing a pax-RaJiv on the Srl Lankans, troops of the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) landing on the Jaffna Peninsula even before the agreement allowing them to come to Sri Lanka was inked Predictably the South Indian press was almost ecstatic, but the rest of the Press in India was every supportive of the IPKF which treated Srl Lanka as an occupied land, controlling its airspace and sea lanes as well as most of the North of Sri Lanka. It was only when the IPKF and LTTE fell apart and came to blows, that LTTE started to get a bad Press l.e„ except In Tamil Nadu.
In Pakistan, the insurgencies that really count were in former East Pakistan (1971) and Balochistan (1974). During 1971 in the then West Pakistan the Press kept Ilie people in the dark as to what was happening, the backlash was the population later tended to accept even what was blatantly untrue. Balochistan was not well reported by the Pakistan Press with the result that the wrongs that took place got embellished by rumours in the vacuum of actual knowledge. Even a person of the stature of Sherbaz Khan
Mazari had his facts wrong about what the Army was doing Reading his book Journey into Disillusionment, I must have been commanding an infantry company in some other land than what he was talking about
The Tamil revolt In Sri Lanka has very good coverage In India, especially tn Tamil Nadu. The Press In the rest of India seldom tries to display the Sinhalese viewpoint except during a brief period when Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated by LTTE cadres and there was a backlash against Prabhakaran. What about the many ongoing conflicts within India presently the only country when there is insurrection of any kind? Is there any coverage at all in India? What about the atrocities being committed m Kashmir? What about the 50-year old insurrection in Mizoram. Manipur and Nagaland? What about the more recent ones In Assam, Tripura, Bodoland, etc?
But let's not put all the blame on India. Putting ii bluntly, the Press In South Asia, be It Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, etc., only follows the official line where regional conflicts are concerned. However the great paradox is that tn the largest democracy of the world the media has imposed a self-restraint that makes it far less free than In Pakistan which today boasts a very free Press despite being under the only military rule in South Asia.
South Asia can have peace and harmony between the nations. races and religions if the media play an objective role by stating the truth as It is.