& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

Aussies unhappy at ICC
MELBOURNE.
V July 12 (AP AFPl;
B | H Brett Lee will take no part an inquiry into his bowling action until the International Cricket Council explains why it took three months to launch the investigations. Australian Cricket Board chief executive Malcolm Speed said.
Speed said he was disappointed that the ICC took so long to react to concerns about Lee s action raised by two umpires during the Australia vs. New Zealand Test series in March.
“I've written to the ICC, I’m not happy about some of the procedures that have been followed here." he said. Tve written to them and asked them a series of questions before we set a date for Brett to go before the panel."
"In the meantime it's business as usual." Speed told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation radio.
The ICC announced Tuesday its Illegal Deliveries Panel would investigate chucking allegations against Lee "as a matter of priority" before the August 16 Australia vs. South Africa match in Melbourne.
Lee, who was only advised late Monday of the allegations, was invited to participate in the inguiry. set to be conducted via video conference.
Speed said Lee was scheduled to play all three limited-overs internationals against South
Africa next month.
He said if the Illegal Deliveries Panel found some evidence of chucking against Lee. the matter would be referred to the ACB to remedy.
Speed said fast bowling great
MALCOLM SPEED Dennis Lillee worked with Lee. while biomechanics and medical experts would conduct tests to prove the 23-vear-old fast bowler s action is legal.
Meanwhile, a senior Australian official said today that the ICC's handling of chucking allegations against paceman Lee was totally unsatisfactory’
Australian Cricketers’ Association chief executive Tim May said the delay in .ti lling Australia of the rejxirK was not acceptable and called for an overhaul of the ICC’s review process.
The fac t (hat ii has taken (hat long is totally aqd abso-
lutely unsatisfactory." May told ABC radio.
May said the pressure on players from such allegations required they be dealt with as soon as possible.
“In any of these cases where a bowler’s delivery action is under scrutiny it has to be dealt with in an efficient and timely manner." he said, adding that the make-up of the 1 O-strong ICC committee appointed to review chucking allegations was too slow and unwidely
He called for a three to five man committee which could move very' quickly, using expert advice and the latest in technology.
“There’s an absolute need for some sort of human movement expert and experts in law." May said. •
He added that television replays meant players were watched as never before, and such close scrutiny did not benefit the game.
"As an ex-cricketer. I can tell you that 99 per cent of cricketers some time during their career probably would have bowled a delivery which could be deemed doubtful." he said.
“If we continue to scrutinise to the nth degree 1 don’t really see that is a benefit to cricket. There’s got to be some degree of variation that a bowler's action can fall within.”
May said he did not think there was anything wrong with Lee’s bowling action, but he would carry a tremendous psy-< liological burden knowing that everyone was watching him.