& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

CCDM served notice

Sports Reporter
The ongoing tiecontroversy took a new turn as Kalabagan Krira served a show cause notice on the Cricket Committee of Dhaka Metropolitan (CCDM) yesterday.
The organisers have been asked to explain within 48 hours as to why Kalabagn cannot take the help of ICC law to determine the result of their curtailed match against Abahani Krira Chakra on March 9 at the Bangabandhu National Stadium.
Interestingly though, the CCDM by-laws do not even permit any club to seek legal action of any kind against the organisers.
Earlier Kalabagan lodged a formal complaint to the organisers, claiming that the very-match was tied and they won it by virtue of losing fewer wickets.
Kalabagan were given a revised target following the loss of a 90-minute playtime due to players' scuffle on the pitch. They scored 187 for six Ln 40 overs (chasing a revised target of 188 in 40 overs), but Abahani. who scored 207 all out in 50 overs, were declared winners by one run.
Since then. Kalabagan are demanding that the fate of the match be decided applying the ICC Code of Conduct, Standard Playing Conditions and Other Regulations-1999. While the CCDM is saying that the Playing Conditions of Janakantha
Premier Division Cricket League 1999-2000 will only be applicable In this regard.
The CCDM formulated the bye-laws following the rules and regulations of the 1998 Code of Conduct of ICC and the BCB-introduced playing condition for one-dayers. When the ICC manual clearly states Duckworth-Lewis method for curtailed matches while the CCDM bye-laws offer ambiguity. The CCDM manual is plain and simple-- there is no provision for a tie match
Meanwhile. CCDM secretary Mahmud UI Haq Manu turned down Kalabagan appeal yesterday saying that the 1999 ICC Code cannot come into play as the target was not set on the basis of Duckworth-Lewis method.
“The target was given basing on the playing condition of ours. In our bye-laws, there is no such provision. Thus the second team chasing a revised target cannot clinch a tie." Manu argued.
To the contrary, the Clause Six of the Appendix Two of the ICC manual says. “If team two achieve their i< piired target they win by number of wickets they have in hand when they reach the score. If they fail short of their required target by exactly one run. the result is tic."
However, to review the whole situation, the CCDM has called an emergency meeting at the Banganadhu National Stadium today.