& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

Will Clinton be another Kennedy or Jimmy Carter?
WASHINGTON. Dec 12: Will Bill Clinton be another John F Kennedy, who at 43 was the youngest man ever to win election to the US presidency, was the symbol of a new generation that initiated a wave of civil rights and poverty reforms, and who brought an assertiveness to US power worldwide? reports IPS.
Or will he be another Jimmy Carter, the last Democratic president, whose constant efforts to reconcile different parts of his political coalition amid rapid global changes ultimately crashed against galloping inflation and a rightwing tide led by Ronald Reagan?
The two questions dominate political talk in Washington now that the Arkansas governor has ended
the Democrats' 12-year exile from the White House.
But the 46-year-oid president-elect is not saying much from his state s capital of Little Rock, where he is closeted away with his family and his closest advisers.
Hungry for even the smallest hints on who might be in or out in the coming administration, reporters and analysts are contenting themselves with rumours and speculation.
The problem is that Clinton, like any good politician, was able throughout his campaign to assure every faction in the traditionally fractious democratic party that he is on its side.
He was thus able to hole together a winning coalition that Included mtddle-and workingclass Whites, and Blacks, the
oldest and youngest voters, foreign policy hawks and doves, pro-government liberals, Wall Street bankers, blue-collar protectionists and white-collar free traders.
All of these groups now believe Bill Clinton is on their side — or at least more on their side than the hapless outgoing president George Bush — and they expect him to prove it soon. So along with the speculation, expectations are also rising. Both Kennedy and Carter were also brought to office with similarly nebulous mandates. Kennedy was elected on the rather vague promise of getting "the country moving again" after eight years of bland Republican leadership.
Carter came tn as "the final chapter of Watergate," as One
pundit put it — an outsider whose quiet Christian faith and unpretentious morality seemed fitted perfectly to redeem Washington from the scandal and real politics of Richard Nixon.
But they governed very differently in very different times.
Kennedy, the brash young scion of the nation's leading Irish-American family, was a decisive leader. After hearing a range of views, he usually met With his closest aides, made a decision and stuck to it; He did not tolerate leaks or backbiting within the top ranks of his administration.
Carter, the Georgia engineer and peanut farmer, was known for welcoming input from all sources — and then anguishing over what to do.
Surrounded by strong per-
sonalities. he was perceived as being pushed and pulled in different directions as he tried to master every question. Disappointed policy-makers leaked infighting to the press which furthered the impression of disarray.
Kennedy also took power at a time of great generational change that has tended to manliest itself in major form movements in the United States about every 30 years.
Just as the progressive movement reached its height early this century in response to the excesses of the robber barons of the big banks and industry. and Franklin Roosevelt began the new deal after the Republican roaring 1920s. so Kennedy was poised to shake the country from Its post-war lethargy.
Clinton now find himself compared with both presidents. Those who sec him as a new Kennedy point not only to his youth, intelligence and gestures (which uncannily evoke the assassinated president), but also to the likelihood that Clinton could be the benefl-ciaiy of the 30-year-cycle. particularly now that it is clear the 'Reagan (counter-) revolution has run Its course.
Those who see Carter in Clinton note the southern roots, his tendency as governor to always seek the middle ground in policy disputes, the wide differences among those seen as hi* principal advisers on key issues of foreign policy and the economy, and the unhealed wounds of party battles fought tong ago