& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

WHAT OTHERS SAY
Censored at the Front
The U.S. Defense Department’s revised rule* for covering a war in the Oulf arc much less onerous than those originally proposed. Yet the Pentagon still says that all dispatches will be reviewed by officers In the field. Censorship in wartime can be essential to safety and security, but when It becomes excessive, citizens lose their chance to judge public policy.
Under the rules, combat coverage would be carried out exclusively by representative groups of reporter* known a* pools, which would be assembled, escorted and tightly monitored by the military. The pool reports would then be submitted to a 'security review" before being dispatched abroad.
In exchange for access, the Pentagon extracts a heavy price: 'security review'. The rules include the statement that "material will not be withheld just because it is embarrassing or contains criticism.' Even so. review may delay dissemination of Information to an anxious public and. worse, cause Incomplete and misleading reports.
Trust and forbearance are required of both sides. Reporters are obliged to accept important limitations on what they may report. Withih those limitations, the military is obliged to allow reporters to file accurate and complete accounts. Such a bargain was struck tn Vietnam. The press accepted ground rules: the military imposed no censorship. There were virtually no breaches of security.
That model might well work in the Gulf. But unless the Pentagon changes its mind, the media have little or no choice but to go along grudgingly - and hope that the military will enforce its rules with understanding.
—The New York Times.
Looking to War and Beyond
No matter how bright the immediate impact of Iraq’s defeat appears to be In Western eyes, the effect in the longer term could be ominous for peace in the region and beyond.
— Times gf India (New Deihii
An Affront to the Haitians
The putsch attempt was an affront to the International community, which had committed Itself to seeing that the honesty of the election |Dec. 16 of Jean-Bertrand Aristide) would be respected and which had obtained the Haitian army's support toward that end. It was an affront to the United Stales, which had used all Ils influence to avoid dirty trick* by Duvalierist forces. And It was an almost farcical denial of the will of a popula Uon that had voted enmasse
tance to terror and promised to bring dignity and social Justice to his country.
Nonds (PoH^