& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

Zulu won't be let off

News24, Pietermaritzburg
The United Cricket Board (UCB) of South Africa said on Wednesday it would "vigorously oppose" any legal action brought against it by discarded Natal all-rounder Lance Klusener.
Klusener, who has had a national contract since 1996, was not among the 19 players whose contracts were renewed in May and has not been part of the South African post-World Cup touring squads to Bangladesh nor England.
Although the 31-year-old says he is still committed to South African cricket, he regards the non-
renewal of his contract as an unfair blow to his career.
He is claiming the UCB dismissed him unfairly by giving him expectation of a new contract and then doing away with his services, and is demanding compensation.
Klusener will be represented at the Council for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) by the Pietermaritzburg firm of Shepstone and Wylie.
But the head of the UCB's legal and disciplinary committee, Brandon Foot, said on Wednesday that Klusener's "referral to the CCMA will be vigorously opposed, with particular reference to section 189 of the Labour Relations Act".
"The matter is very important and may set a precedent for not only
cricket, but for all sport in South Africa with reference to the application of our labour legislation, and particularly section 189," Foot
added.
A leading labour lawyer who has been involved in sports contracts disputes before, said that on face value he felt Klusener was totally warranted in expecting compensation.
"Section 189 of the Labour Relations Act is totally irrelevant to Klusener's case because it has to do with the retrenchment of permanent employees.
"Klusener's complaint is that his contract was dropped after he was given almost certain expectation that it would be renewed.
"Given that he had been under contract for a long time, with several renewals, did well in the World Cup and, most importantly, was apparently told he was being rested which therefore means he was going to continue being employed, I believe the UCB's case is dead in the water."