& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

Can Arabs wash their hands off this blood?

DR. BUTHAINA SHAABAN, ArabNews.com
In the early morning of the first day of the aggression against Iraq, Dennis Ross, director of the Washington Institution for Near East Policy, wrote: "While many European leaders remained aloof from support for the war on Iraq, many weeks ago the Arab leaders began to acclimatise themselves to the new situation. They not only ceased any attempt to prevent the war but they began to show signs that they did not want to be on the side of any opposition to the United States in the region."
Ross goes on to say: "For example, think of the official Egyptian information channels which still assure us that Saddam is responsible for the present dispute. On his visit to Berlin, President Hosni Mubarak confirmed to his hosts that the time had come to put an end to the dispute and to change Saddam."
There is not enough space to list the glorious deeds of some of
the Arab organisations which opened their land and air space, including their coastal areas, to the British and American forces.
Iran, however, has refused to provide such access.
Even Iran, which in its war with Iraq suffered more than any Arab country refused to open its air space. Belgium, Germany and Turkey refused permission for American forces to use their territories to embark on an unjust and unfair war against Iraq, despite the millions of dollars they were offered and in spite of the pressure, incentives, threats and promises.
In other words, at the most decisive and difficult moment, some Arab leaders deserted a sister Arab country, while some neighbouring countries supported it, and Western countries without any historical, linguistic or cultural ties to the Iraqi people did likewise.
What does it mean to talk about Arab solidarity? What do all these
meetings, resolutions and final communiques mean? Why the pretence of a deep concern for the Arabs and Arabism?
The masks have come off, and we are confronted with the painful historical reality that this aggression on the people, land, skies and wealth of Iraq would not have been possible if the Arab countries had barred their facilities to the invader. These Arab countries must bear responsibility for this aggression along with the United States and Britain.
The Arab people are weary of the use of meaningless phrases. The time has come for all of us to call a spade a spade. Arabs understand the difference between truth and fiction very well: They see, hear and read. And they know that they are paying a high price because their leaders have abandoned them.
Their leaders have left the Arabs to fend for themselves, having ruined their standing and honour among nations. It is no
wonder that the world does not respect the Arabs.
When the bombs started to fall, I was watching from New York via satellite. I saw correspondents mobilised like combatants. All were happy to talk about smart weapons and the achievement of US technology. The deserts and capitals of the Arab countries are deemed to be lawful targets for this technology.
The battlefield appeared to me the launching pad of an army of aliens. It was as if an Atari computer game was being created, directed and played in a land of people without will and without power of decision. But in the intense blackness of the moment, there was no doubt that the whole of the Arab people were poised for change.
Truthfulness with ourselves and others was not a luxury but an absolute necessity, from which there was no escape.
The writer is director of External Information, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Syria.