& çâÌæÚUæð´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Îð¹Ùæ ÁæÚUè ÚU¹ð´ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ÂÚU ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´Ð ãæÚU Ù ×æÙð´, €UØô´ç·¤ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÙð âð ¥æÂ·¤ô ©gðàØ ·¤è Âýæç# ãôÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÁèßÙ ·¤æ ¹æÜèÂÙ ÎêÚU ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÖÜð ãè ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙè Öè ·¤çÆÙæ§ü €UØô´ Ù ¥æ°, çÁ™ææâæ ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ð´Ð ŠØæÙ ÚU¹ð´, ÜÿØ ã×ðàææ ¥æÂ·Ô¤ Âæâ ãôÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ÂýØæâ ¥æÂ ·¤Öè Öè àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð

Bush promises UN fresh evidence against Iraq

Powell to present US case on Feb 5

AFP, Washington
President George W Bush promised to produce new evidence against Iraq in a bid to convince wary allies that Baghdad is flouting UN demands to disarm, earning a cautious welcome from Russia yesterday.
In his State of the Union address to Congress late Tuesday, Bush also threatened to unleash the full force of the US military to oust Iraqi President Saddam Hussein from power.
US Secretary of State Colin Powell is to go to the UN Security Council on February 5 to present "information and intelligence about Iraq's illegal weapons programmes, its attempts to hide those weapons from inspectors and its links to terrorist groups", Bush said.
The United States has been under growing international pressure to work through the United Nations and give weapons inspectors in Iraq more time to carry out their work before going to war.
Initial reaction to Bush's decision to return to the UN to strengthen its case against Iraq was positive, with veto-wielding Security Council members France and Russia saying they would give Washington a fair hearing.
"We are ready to listen and analyse attentively the FROM PAGE 1
additional information which the US Secretary of State plans to present before the UN Security Council," the Russian foreign ministry said in a statement.
Facing a drop in domestic support in part over concerns about a war, Bush nevertheless warned thousands of US troops massing in the Gulf that "crucial hours may lie ahead".
"We will consult, but let there be no misunderstanding: If Saddam Hussein does not disarm, for the safety of our people and the peace of the world, we will lead a coalition to disarm him," Bush said.
"If war is forced upon us, we will fight with the full force and might of the United States military -- and we will prevail," Bush said.
Bush insisted that he still hoped for a peaceful solution while branding Saddam a dictator who oppressed his own people and threatened others.
"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent," he said. "If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, all recriminations would come to late."
"Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein and is not an option," Bush said.
Russia continued to push for a diplomatic solution to the standoff, a day after hinting that its patience was running out with its Soviet-era ally and that it could toughen its stance if Iraq did not cooperate with the UN.
"We have to do everything possible to avoid a war," Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov told reporters in Moscow.
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan told German weekly Die Zeit that the threat of force was more
effective in persuading Saddam to disarm than the use of force, while conceding that the threat "has influenced the behaviour of the Iraqi government."
France welcomed Bush's call for the Security Council meeting, after challenging the United States Tuesday to give the UN the intelligence Washington says it has to back up allegations against Saddam.
"I welcome this American decision. It's been several weeks that we have been asking all of those who have particular information" to share it with UN weapons inspectors, Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin told RTL radio in Paris.
Germany, which along with France has spearheaded European opposition to a solo US strike on Iraq also welcomed the announcement, with Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer again insisting that any decision on the use of force should be made through the Security Council, where Berlin has recently gained a seat.
The EU's foreign policy official, Javier Solana, echoed that the top UN body was the forum for decisionmaking on Iraq "to avoid the catastrophe of a war."
"The centre of gravity should continue to be the Security Council," Solana said.
But Bush's address hit world stock markets and prompted a spike in oil prices, with investors fearing an armed conflict was becoming increasingly likely and fleeing the dollar.
The UN World Food Programme said in Amman it was stocking up food in countries neighbouring Iraq and was planning on having to feed up to 10 million people in the event of war.
Australian Prime Minister John Howard, one of the staunchest supporters of the US campaign to disarm Iraq, welcomed Bush's vow to pursue the diplomatic route and present evidence against Saddam.
"That puts it right at the feet of the Security Council where the matter belongs," he said.
Chief weapons inspector Hans Blix and head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, Mohamed ElBaradei presented reports to the Security Council on Monday, saying that Iraq had not fully cooperated with inspections.
The newspaper of Saddam elder son Uday described the report as "unfair," warning that an "unpleasant surprise" awaited any invaders.
Egypt said the report did not justify a war, Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher told the Arabic daily Al-Hayat, appealing for Western states to do more to help UN weapons inspectors complete their mission and for Iraq to cooperate.
The fresh US initiative, aimed at overcoming opposition on the Security Council to military action, would set the stage for a possible rerun of the dramatic 1962 Cold War confrontation over the Cuban missile crisis.
Powell has specifically referred to a Security Council debate in October 1962, when then US ambassador to the United Nations, Adlai Stevenson, presented aerial photographs of Soviet missiles in Cuba -- evidence that marked a turning point in the 13-day missile crisis.
Senior US officials have declined to say what previously undisclosed intelligence would be included in evidence Powell is to present to the UN.